Â
Full PDF Version Available:
Â
NU Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NU), Initiation Summary
“Wider, Better, Faster, Stronger”, only if the credit stays risk-adjusted
Field | Detail |
Entry Price | US$14.51 |
Target Price | US$18.34 |
Upside | 26.4% |
Market Cap | US$70.5B |
Date | 12 April 2026 |
Sector | Financials, LATAM |
Analyst: Christopher Hwang, CFA, https://www.studiochick.net
Investment Case
Nu is no longer a Brazil neobank story alone. Brazil has proven the model; the debate now is whether that monetisation curve travels into Mexico and, later, Colombia.
- Growth duration is underestimated. By FY2025 Nu reached 131m global customers, with 113m in Brazil and 62% adult penetration there, the largest private financial institution in Brazil by customer count. Mexico sits earlier on the same curve at roughly 15% adult penetration, already the leading issuer of new credit cards but well behind Brazil on lending depth, deposit maturity and ARPAC. Colombia, with over 4m customers, is treated as long-duration optionality rather than a near-term earnings driver. If Mexico follows even part of Brazil’s path, the market is too short on growth duration.
- Four costs moat. Nu’s advantage compounds across acquisition, servicing, funding and risk together. Cost to acquire is about $7 per customer versus $22 to $114.6 at Brazilian incumbents. Cost to serve sits around $0.8 per active customer per month, with a Q4’25 efficiency ratio of 19.9%. Deposits reached $41.9bn in FY2025, up 45% yoy, funding a $32.7bn credit portfolio at a cost of funds around 87% of interbank rates. Risk is managed, not avoided, through NuFormer, Nu’s proprietary model used for credit card underwriting in Brazil and Mexico.
- ARPAC runway. Nu does not need another customer boom. Q4’25 ARPAC reached $15, up from $11.1 a year earlier, and the company shipped over 100 new products and features in FY2025. The cohort path runs from $13.30 blended monthly ARPAC today, to roughly $26 for mature 8-year-plus cohorts, to roughly $45 for fully cross-sold core users (card, account and personal loan). Credit cards and loans remain the main engine: FY2025 interest income was $4.6bn from cards and $4.8bn from loans, against $3.9bn of deposit interest expense.
Financial Summary (US$mn)
Metric | 2025A | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E |
Net Revenue | 10,830 | 14,418 | 17,976 | 23,061 |
Net Interest Income | 8,856 | 11,546 | 14,510 | 18,899 |
Provisions | (4,205) | (5,545) | (6,836) | (8,582) |
Non-Interest Expense | (2,753) | (3,390) | (4,020) | (4,886) |
Adjusted Net Profit | 2,869 | 4,065 | 5,281 | 7,117 |
EPS | 0.59 | 0.83 | 1.07 | 1.44 |
Total Customers (mn) | 131.0 | 145.6 | 161.1 | 177.5 |
Monthly ARPAC | 13.3 | 15.4 | 17.7 | 20.2 |
Deposits | 41,925 | 51,534 | 62,760 | 75,541 |
Net Loans | 27,689 | 33,924 | 43,464 | 55,565 |
Efficiency Ratio | 25.4% | 23.5% | 22.4% | 21.2% |
CET1 Ratio | 13.0% | 14.9% | 14.8% | 14.3% |
RORWA | 11.2% | 11.4% | 11.7% | 12.4% |
FY2025 headline figures reported by Nu: revenue $16.3bn, net income $2.9bn, 33% ROE. The model’s net revenue line (NII plus non-interest income net of transactional expense) is a cleaner bank-style measure used for valuation, distinct from the headline figure.
Valuation
Method | Implied Price | Weight / Status | Notes |
Residual Income Model | $18.46 | Primary | Ke 12.43% (Rf 3.95%, adjusted beta 1.055, ERP 8.05%), terminal growth 5.5% |
Forward PEG, peer median 0.53x | $16.81 | Cross-check | +15.9% vs entry |
Forward PEG, peer average 0.83x | $25.99 | Cross-check | +79.1% vs entry |
Weighted Target (80% RIM / 20% PEG) | $18.34 | Final | +26.4% vs entry |
Bear case | $11.30 | Scenario | Selic/macro/credit stress |
Bull case | $23.80 | Scenario | Higher ROE and stronger expansion |
RIM is used as the primary method rather than DCF because for a bank-like fintech, capital, provisions and excess ROE over cost of equity drive value more than free cash flow. Forecast net income rises from $4.1bn (FY2026E) to $9.5bn (FY2029E), with excess return (residual earnings) rising from $2.7bn to $6.9bn.
Geographic Mix (FY2025)
Market | % of Customers | % of Deposits |
Brazil | 86% | 79% |
Mexico | 11% | 15% |
Colombia | 3% | 6% |
Revenue by product: NII 79%, card fee 15%, late fee 3%, insurance c.0%, other 2%.
Pricing Strategy
Nu’s model is low-friction entry plus risk-priced monetisation, not “cheap banking”. It works in three layers. Incoming pricing wins the first relationship through no-fee cards and visibly high deposit yields, such as Mexico’s Cajitas (6.5% liquid, 13% Cajita Turbo promotional) and Colombia’s Cajitas (up to 11.25% AER). Lock-in pricing turns usage into habit through goal-based pockets, frozen-balance terms and risk-based credit limit progression. Portfolio pricing is where the economics actually sit: Mexico’s credit cards carry no annual fee but an average CAT (total annual cost) of 145.8%, Brazil’s revolving card rates run 2.75% to 19.99% per month, and Colombia’s card tariff carries a 28.17% effective annual rate alongside zero management and insurance fees. The front end looks cheap; the back end is where Nu earns its spread.
Top Risks
- Credit cycle deterioration. The credit portfolio reached $32.7bn in FY2025 (+40% yoy), with 90+ day NPL at 6.6%. Provisions are a structural cost of growth, not a one-off.
- Deposit-rate competition. Funding leans on customer deposits, and Mexico and Colombia still need visibly attractive yields to acquire and retain balances, which could push funding costs up faster than lending yields.
- Mexico execution risk. Mexico is the largest upside driver but still earlier in converting card users into deposit and lending relationships; slower conversion weakens the growth-duration thesis.
- Regulatory cost creep. As Nu becomes more bank-like, deposit protection contributions (such as Mexico’s Prosofipo) and prudential rules could erode part of the cost advantage.
- Brazil concentration. Brazil remains the core profit pool, so any deterioration in Brazilian consumer credit, regulation or competition disproportionately hits consolidated earnings.
- Valuation de-rating. If ARPAC growth slows or Mexico disappoints, the stock could de-rate even with continued earnings growth, though the RIM anchor is built on excess ROE rather than a pure fintech multiple.
Top Catalysts
- Quarterly earnings, watching ARPAC, NII growth, provisions, NPL trend, efficiency ratio and deposit cost, with beats driven by ARPAC or efficiency mattering more than customer growth alone.
- Mexico monetisation acceleration, the clearest test of whether card-led acquisition converts into primary banking relationships.
- ARPAC step-up from existing users, already visible at $15 in Q4’25, the cleanest catalyst since it needs no new customer boom.
- Credit quality resilience, where stable NPLs and coverage while lending grows would validate the underwriting and data advantage.
- Loan-to-deposit deployment, converting the large under-deployed deposit base into higher-yielding credit without funding cost or loss pressure.
- Secured and payroll lending mix shift, reducing the volatility of a currently credit-heavy earnings base.
- Colombia scaling proof (2027+), useful evidence the Brazil/Mexico playbook is repeatable, though not yet core to the valuation.
- US bank launch optionality (2028+), following conditional OCC approval for Nubank N.A. in January 2026, treated as option value rather than base case.
SWOT Snapshot
Strengths: scale-led franchise (131m customers, 86% activity rate in Brazil), low cost to serve, deposit-funded lending flywheel (funding headroom roughly 2x net credit portfolio), proven profitability (FY2025 ROE 33%), AI-enabled underwriting via NuFormer.
Weaknesses: Brazil remains the profit anchor, earnings are credit-risk intensive (FY2025 provisions of $4.2bn vs $3.2bn in FY2024), deposit pricing pressure in Mexico and Colombia, short-duration deposit base, fee income still card and loan heavy.
Opportunities: converting Mexico from card issuer to primary bank, Colombia early-stage scaling (approval capacity nearly tripled), secured/payroll/SME credit expansion, ARPAC and cross-sell growth, reusable AI and platform infrastructure across markets.
Threats: incumbent and fintech competition across all three markets, a deposit-rate war as promotional yields normalise, credit cycle normalisation, regulatory and funding-cost burden, execution risk from simultaneous multi-market and AI platform expansion.
Academic and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Author holds no position in the securities discussed. LBS Student Investment Fund decided to include in the portfolio.